46 is the new 50

So people….thought I’d write a quick blog explaining why ALL of my bikes have 46T outer rings. I’ve changed them all and been running them for a few years now. Here’s my logic and explanation why I do.

Having a 46T outer is not an original idea. Arguably quite common on cross bikes with double setups although 1x setups are getting really popular now which adds weight to my argument anyway. More about that in a bit. I think pro cross riders use a 46 or 48 if they run a double setup but on the road its a different ball game.

Compact 50-34 chainsets are the most common ring sizes on road bikes. The idea to change my 50’s to 46 came when I had my shop and one of the guys who rode with us had changed his race bike to a 1x setup and had gone with a 46. I was quite interested in this because at the time I thought it was a bit out there, kind of unique and looking back now, a bit ahead of its time. To run a 1x setup he needed a front ring and rear cassette combination which was going to give him a big gear to race on and a small gear to climb successfully with in the space of 11 sprockets. He had calculated a 46 or a 48 was best for him. But he was tiny so, arguably, didn’t need such a small gear on the back. This resonated with me a bit and I turned on nerd mode and began to do my own research and calculations.

My cross commuter bike runs a 46-34 chainset. My rear cassette is an 11-28.

Here is some basic maths so bear with me … (calculations courtesy of BikeCalc.com)

Based on a 25mm tyre, the gear 46×11 = 110.59 inches. The nearest gear on a 50 chainring is 50×12 = 110.32 inches. So straight away I get a good, big gear. I asked myself an honest question, when I rode a 50 ring, how many of the rear sprockets did I actually use? Honestly, when training, commuting, I would rarely use the top 3 sprockets (11,12 & 13). I still had to have them though as I wanted to keep my 11-28, so by changing to a 46 allowed me to use more of my cassette’s smaller sprockets or the 11, 12 & 13. Switching to a 46 kept my top gear high but the most important thing was it gave me a lower gear on on it which was enough to significantly reduce the need to change to the small ring. My smallest gear on the 46 is 46×28 = 43.39 inches which is right in between 34 x 20 or 21. Thats pretty low and low enough for most reasonable hills. I can ride up and down the Lickeys on a 46. Couldn’t do that on a 50 or 53. My day to day commutes, training rides and even rides on Zwift now don’t need to me to change to my inner ring on hills. Effectively, the 46 has given me a 1×10 setup BUT…..and this is the best bit. If I hit a super steep climb like a Winwood Heath Road, Beacon Hill or anything in excess of, say, 10-12% my 34 inner is a get out of jail card. I’ve got up the steepest hill I have ever ridden in Wales on a 34-28 so I know I have it covered.

So the bottom line is a 46 uses more of my sprockets, I keep my highest gear, I still have my lowest gear but my  front changes are massively reduced. For me thats a real benefit. To put it in some kind of perspective. On the Mad March Hare Sportive, I realistically would only use my front mech 3 or 4 times to go down and back up onto the big ring twice (2 steep hills). If I ran a 50 or my usual 53, it would be a lot more.

If you are interested in this idea but perhaps bigger than me or less-fit, consider a smaller ring like a 44 or 42T even.

This works for me but won’t be everyone’s cup of tea I know. If you already run a 1x setup its irrelevant. Just wanted to tell you why I do it to get the best out a double.


2 thoughts on “46 is the new 50

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s